πŸ“‹ Case Study

Pharmaceutical Continuous Flow Hydrogenation of API Intermediate

Exothermic runaway risk, inconsistent enantioselectivity, and metal leaching in batch mode

πŸ—οΈ Project Overview

Transition from batch Pd/C slurry hydrogenation to continuous flow for oncology drug intermediate

🎯 Challenge

Exothermic runaway risk, inconsistent enantioselectivity, and metal leaching in batch mode

πŸ”§ Design Approach

Fixed-bed Pd/Alβ‚‚O₃ microreactor with back-pressure regulator, inline IR monitoring, and residence time distribution control

πŸ“ Design Diagram

Pharmaceutical Continuous Flow Hydrogenation Feed A + Hβ‚‚ Pump Fixed-Bed Pd/Alβ‚‚O₃ kLa = 0.042 s⁻¹ BPR IR Design Metrics Ξ”Tad = 89Β°C Residence Time Control β€’ Exothermic runaway risk β€’ Inconsistent enantioselectivity β€’ Metal leaching Feed & Pump Reactor & IR BPR Challenges

AI-generated project design illustration

πŸ“ Key Calculations

Mass Transfer Coefficient (k_La)

k_La = (6 Γ— Ξ΅_g Γ— u_s) / d_b
Result: 0.042 s⁻¹
Ensures Hβ‚‚ availability at catalyst surface

Adiabatic Temp Rise (Ξ”T_ad)

Ξ”T_ad = βˆ’Ξ”H_rxn Γ— C_A0 / (ρ Γ— Cp)
Result: 89Β°C
Required active cooling design

πŸ“Š Results

99.2% ee maintained across 6-month run; 40% reduction in Pd usage; zero safety incidents

πŸ’‘ Lessons Learned

  • β€’Microreactor heat removal outperforms batch jacketing
  • β€’Real-time analytics enable closed-loop quality control

βœ… Key Takeaways

  • 1Microreactor heat removal outperforms batch jacketing
  • 2Real-time analytics enable closed-loop quality control