π Case Study
Refinery FCC Unit Predictive Maintenance Twin
Unplanned shutdowns averaging 17 hrs/unit/yr costing ~$1.2M each
ποΈ Project Overview
Digital twin deployment across 4 fluid catalytic cracking units in Texas Gulf Coast refinery
π― Challenge
Unplanned shutdowns averaging 17 hrs/unit/yr costing ~$1.2M each
π§ Design Approach
Multi-physics twin coupling reactor hydrodynamics, regenerator thermodynamics, and catalyst circulation dynamics; embedded with unscented Kalman filter for state estimation
π Design Diagram
AI-generated project design illustration
π Key Calculations
Catalyst Circulation Rate Deviation
ΞαΉ_cat = αΉ_measured β αΉ_twin
Result: +4.2 t/h
Early indicator of cyclone erosion
Regenerator Bed Temp Gradient
βT = T_top β T_bottom
Result: β82Β°C
Threshold >β75Β°C triggers inspection
π Results
83% reduction in unplanned outages, 92% accuracy in >48-hr failure prediction, 4.7x ROI in Year 2π‘ Lessons Learned
- β’Twin must include mechanical wear modelsβnot just thermofluidic states
- β’Edge preprocessing reduces cloud inference latency by 63%
β Key Takeaways
- 1Twin must include mechanical wear modelsβnot just thermofluidic states
- 2Edge preprocessing reduces cloud inference latency by 63%