๐Ÿ“‹ Case Study

Heat Integration in Ethylene Oxide Absorption Column

Poor COโ‚‚ co-absorption leading to catalyst deactivation and product loss

๐Ÿ—๏ธ Project Overview

Retrofit of EO recovery unit in Gulf Coast petrochemical plant

๐ŸŽฏ Challenge

Poor COโ‚‚ co-absorption leading to catalyst deactivation and product loss

๐Ÿ”ง Design Approach

Added structured packing section with staged solvent cooling and inter-stage heat exchange

๐Ÿ“ Design Diagram

Absorption Column Structured Packing HTUog = 1.42 m Solvent (x_in) Gas (y_in) Gas (y_out) Solvent (x_out) Cooling Cooling COโ‚‚ co-absorption โ†’ catalyst deactivation ฮฑ = 12.8 (y_in โˆ’ y_out)/(x_out โˆ’ x_in) Heat Integration in EO Absorption Column

AI-generated project design illustration

๐Ÿ“ Key Calculations

Overall Mass Transfer Unit Height (HTUog)

H = G/(K_GยทaยทA)
Result: 1.42 m
Determines required packing height

Solvent Loading Ratio

ฮฑ = (y_in โˆ’ y_out)/(x_out โˆ’ x_in)
Result: 12.8
Drives reboiler duty and regeneration energy

๐Ÿ“Š Results

COโ‚‚ impurity reduced from 120 ppm to <8 ppm; ethylene oxide yield increased by 3.2%

๐Ÿ’ก Lessons Learned

  • โ€ขLocal HTU variation along column height invalidates single-value assumptions
  • โ€ขSolvent temperature profile impacts both kinetics and equilibrium

โœ… Key Takeaways

  • 1Local HTU variation along column height invalidates single-value assumptions
  • 2Solvent temperature profile impacts both kinetics and equilibrium